The point is that a (new) syntax for any language needs to support any such impl... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		exceptione 21 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go The point is that a (new) syntax for any language needs to support any such implementation. The language implementation itself is not the point.

gethly 21 days ago [–]

Yes, and I am saying Go has already solved all of this and it makes little sense to deviate too much from its syntax.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact