This is pointless discussion as Go has all of these things already implemented, ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		gethly 21 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go This is pointless discussion as Go has all of these things already implemented, so there is no point in going backwards.

exceptione 20 days ago [–]

The point is that a (new) syntax for any language needs to support any such implementation. The language implementation itself is not the point.

gethly 20 days ago | [–]

Yes, and I am saying Go has already solved all of this and it makes little sense to deviate too much from its syntax.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact