Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
arccy
13 days ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Gpg.fail
ssh or minisign for signing age for file encryption
johnisgood
13 days ago
|
next
[–]
There are people who use GPG for more than that. Those that are fine with just those two features, sure. Heck, you can encrypt with "openssh", no need for age. :D I have a bash function for encryption and decryption!
reply
cpach
13 days ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Those people should perhaps ponder if it’s a reasonable thing to insist on using this broken standard/tool in 2025.
reply
johnisgood
13 days ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Yeah, well, I wish I could convince people to use 2-4 different tools when one does it "just fine".
reply
akerl_
13 days ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
I thought the whole unix philosophy was to have a bunch of tools that each do one thing well, and to compose them into the workflow you want.
reply
johnisgood
13 days ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
And I thought most projects would be licensed as GNU by now but alas.
reply
pabs3
13 days ago
|
prev
[–]
The gpg.fail page mentions minisign vulns too.
reply
arccy
12 days ago
|
parent
[–]
The minisign ones are much weaker though? "just" display of data, one of them not even through minisign itself.
reply
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: