Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We analyzed hundreds of stock recommendation videos from finance YouTubers (aka finfluencers) and backtested the results. Turns out, doing the opposite of what they say—literally inverting the advice—beat the S&P 500 by over +6.8% in annual returns (but with higher volatility).


how does that compare to betting against Jim Cramer?


I haven't benchmarked inverse Cramer recently, but last I heard not too well: https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/187612o/inv...

Anyone know how it is doing recently?


I've thought inverse-Cramer was doomed ever since he shouted it out on twitter. Kind of short-circuits the whole thing.


Yep! Markets are theoretically efficient.


Even just in name, "finance influencer" sounds very similar to "market manipulator".


Influencers often market things and make money off things other than being good at [name a skill or thing they are influencing]. For finance previous work has shown that financial influencers are are worse advice givers are actually the more popular ones.


Not necessarily... Depends on what they peddle, but could be just your motivational speaker, self-help or course grifter.


Studies have been done that show that. Of course, if it is an old study, results need to be run on new data.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: