What's the appeal behind Wayland? I've been using X for a while now (linux n00b) and I really enjoy having everything like this, there even are a couple apps I use specifically for X11.
It's not perfect, but personally I appreciate the better security model of Wayland. Although it can be annoying if you have to do screensharing/recording. On my older laptop, it also feels more responsive.
I'm on Wayland via Fedora, and we use Zoom for company video conferencing. About 2 months ago they released a new version that started supporting screen sharing on Wayland. Works perfectly.
Edited for grammar and to add this:
My point being is that it's slowly but surely getting better and better.
Which version are you using right now? I have the latest one and it does not allow me to share anything else than a white canvas.
Do you launch zoom somehow differently? For me it behaves like a regular XWayland app
Sadly I'm not able to test this since I'm not running Fedora and GNOME. I'm using sway.
Interestingly enough, Zoom change log does not seem to mention anything related to Wayland support: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/205759689-New-Upda....
Thank you for your comment, will try this in GNOME some time.
Sway has too many bleeding edge dependencies last time I checked, so it’s hard to get built and running on a “conventional” desktop-oriented desktop like Ubuntu.
The author has iirc even actively discouraged Ubuntu and Debian from packaging it, because he doesn’t want distro users creating bug reports on older versions (ie noise) for bugs already fixed in git master.
Once sway lands for regular distro-users, I’ll be there. For now I’ll stick to i3.
It's been so many years and I often take for granted what's before my eyes -- i3 is solidly in the "pry it from my cold dead hands" category.