Because of 2018 operation "Power OFF" but it's still pretty easy to take anything down.
Hetzner has the WEAKEST DDoS protection out of ANYTHING out there - Arbor sucks.
Send me your website url and I'll keep it down for DAYS and whenever you cry to hetzner I'll just fry it again, it's that easy and that's why they're the cheapest - because everyone ran away from them back then.
No but because all of us were arrested in 2018 for running DDoS-4-hire services. Bypassing cloudflare is very easy and I still can fry any of your websites (if i wanted to, just like any other skid)
I was arrested by Interpol in 2018 because of warrants issued by the NCA, DOJ, FBI, J-CAT, and several other agencies, all due to my involvement in running a DDoS-for-hire website. Honestly, anyone can bypass Cloudflare, and anyone that want to take your website down - will take it down. It's just that luckily for all of us most of the DDoS-4-hire websites are down nowadays but there are still many botnets out there that will get past basically any protection and you can get access to them for basically $5.
One minute, what? Can you elaborate on that. I have loads of questions. What exactly were you doing? What consequences did you face? How come you are talking about it?
It depends how you wanna bypass it. (https://roundproxies.com/blog/bypass-cloudflare/) e.g. I found out that they track TLS, HTTP headers and Javascript JS fingerprinting. There are def some ways, personally using browsers but yeah. maybe take a look at that guide above foudn that helpful as a good starting point tho
Like? Aside from scanning DNS records (assuming the protected IP is in there somewhere) or scanning the entire IPv4 (assuming the server responds to non CloudFlare requests), I can't think of any. And both methods are simple to protect against.
I'm actually so furious about this. No, they did not put the IMX903 (ik this because microns they showed are still 1.22, not 1.4 of the imx903) - even though it was supposed to be in the 15PM. It's the exact same sensor, all they changed is the processing algorithms & new sensor shift OIS (v2). Nothing that 15PM couldn't have been if they bothered 1% (even now they could push an 'OTA' to turn 15PM into 99.97% 16PM (if they were a real company that is)). IMX903 would remove a need to upgrade the sensor for the next 3-4 years (coming from me, who is already using a phone with a way better 1'' sensor (lyt-900)) but no - they choose to do the same crap scamsung and goolag are doing, albeit iPhone sensors are currently way better as the Scamsung/Goolag are still on the old dogshit HP1 and HP2s from 2020/1 tech (yes, GNK is new but it's the same crap, basically a mix of HP1 and 2) so it's still in the era where Sony was unparalleled (now both Samsung and Omni are killing Sony with their latest sensors). And it's crazy how only Chinese phones are pushing new techs, literally if they had better QC and ideas they'd be 5 years ahead of crapple, scamsung and goolag - like this they're barely better. If Apple had my LYT-900 it'd be a murder scene.
It's not a chip but a sensor. The difference between 1/1.28'' and 1/1.14'' may not sound much but the whole tech of the IMX903 (double stacked CMOS for better light gathering, better video performance, cinematic mode) would make it way better. So it'd perform better at night (video especially), it'd have huger pixels & would allow Apple's 24mp mode to truly shine as it'd capture an amazing level of texture any time of the day, like this it just doesn't matter as much
Are there any phones currently using IMX903 sensor? Also, is IMX903 better than lyt-900? Also, which phones are using lyt-900?
True flagships these days are really made by Chinese firms. I am only holding back because of long term software support. I guess I will grab the next gen flagship honor/mi phone.
thanks, was looking for confirmation of this. shame. going to skip this years model and hope they upgrade the camera sensor in the iPhone 17 pro. it's the only reason to switch to a new phone these days
Apparently 10 times more performant than Unity/Leadwerks:
Quoting the dev:
> I am sorry people are making fun of you just for asking for a game engine with good performance. I realized this was a big problem when I was working on VR projects for NASA, and saw how bad other the performance of other engine was. I created a new Vulkan-based game engine designed specifically to solve performance problems in real-time games, and the results turned out much better than I realized was possible. This is the website:[https://www.ultraengine.com/](https://www.ultraengine.com/)
Ultra Engine will run about 10x faster than Unity under heavy loads. You can try the benchmarks and see for yourself. Maybe it will help you. Good luck!
Why are y'all still talking about 9/11 as if the whole world (including brainwashed Americans) doesn't know the truth? Your literal senators are controlling countries (way off their limits), chill.
