Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sbarre's commentslogin

Yeah Javert mangled up those sentences for me as well, it skipped whole parts and then also moved words around

- "its noisiest superlative insisted on its being received"

Win10 RTX 5070 Ti


A sitemap.xml file could get you most of the way there.

Branding and customer relationships matter as much or more than the "billable service" part of Claude Code.

It's not unheard of for companies that have strong customer mindshare to find themselves intermediated by competitors or other products to the point that they just became part of the infrastructure and eventually lose that mindshare.

I doubt Anthropic wants to become a swappable backend for the actual thing that developers reach for to do their work (the CLI tool).

Don't get me wrong, I think developers should 100% have the choice of tooling they want to use.

But from a business standpoint I think maintaining that direct or first-party connection to the developer is what Anthropic are trying to protect here.


I like the approach of paying for major upgrades.. So you get free updates on your current version for as long as you want, but when the next major update comes out, you either stick with your current version at no cost (and ideally still get maintenance and security patches) but if you want the next major version, there's an upgrade cost.

That feels fair to me.


I think perhaps the nuance in the middle here is that for most projects, the quality that professional components bring is less important.

Internal tools and prototypes, both things that quality components can accelerate, have been strong use-cases for these component libraries, just as much as polished commercial customer-facing products.

And I bet volume-wise there's way more of the former than the latter.

So while I think most people who care about quality know you can't (yet) blindly use LLM output in your final product, it's completely ok for internal tools and prototyping.


How long until Atlassian makes "JIRA for Agents" where all your tasks and updates and memory aren't stored in Git (so no merge conflicts) but are still centralized and shareable between all your agents/devs/teams..

And also auditable, trackable, reportable, etc..


they already did, it's called 'JIRA'. not even joking.

you've already hooked up Jira access via MCP/skills jira-cli, yeah?

Oh I don't use JIRA currently, but I used it at a previous job.

I was sort of kidding with "JIRA for Agents", obviously using the API and existing tool you can make agents use it.

We use Github at my current job and similarly have Claude Code update issues and PRs when it does work.


I never knew that "Sega" was "Service Games" shortened.

I never knew it had an American founder. All of my life I'd assumed Sega was entirely a Japanese company, founded by Japanese engineers.

Same thing with Taito, founded by ukranian jew Michael Kogan. The company that created the phenomenal Space Invaders and spark the japanese video game industry from a niche hobby to mainstream.

This has been a fun trivia bit I’ve brought up to people over the years.

IIRC, Sonic 2 was actually developed within the US, in California.

Yes, but largely by a Japanese team moved over out of hopes they could train the Americans and corporate politics.

And I believe Tommy Tallarico was the first American to work on the Sonic franchise, ever.

Still? Pretty sure it's widely acknowledged as one of his many fabrications.

He absolutely was not. The first Sonic game involving American developers was Sonic 2 on Genesis (developed at Sega Technical Institute with a combined American and Japanese crew), and he did not work on that game.

Right. Check out the products they started with. Lots of YouTube out there on the topic.

I have a similar system but it's a bit more ongoing.

Since March 2018 I've created a new playlist "[Month Year]" on the 1st of every month, and every time I listen to a song I enjoy (whether it's new or old or whatever - no rules) I add it to that month's playlist. In fact the only "rule" is to never remove a song once it's added.

Then at the end of the year I make 24-song a "Best of [Year]" playlist where I go back and pick 2 songs from each month, in no particular order, to sum up my year in music.

This tends to reflect my music enjoyment (vs listening) much better than Spotify Wrapped, which over-indexes on music I listen to at work or in the car (when I'm often not really paying attention).

I just crossed 100 months back in November or December, and I have to say it's pretty fun to go back and check out a given month/year in the past (much like the author) and revisit what I was into at the time.


This is a really simple yet clever system and I may have to give it a try! I've created vibes-based playlists at points-in-time but otherwise just dump everything to my "like" list on Spotify which is fairly poorly organized after so many years.

I have one playlist I add songs to I listen to on repeat. Going back through it, it really shows what I was mostly listening to at what time.

Yeah Spotify's "Liked Songs" is that for me.. I just throw stuff in there that I want to keep track of.. I have 3,671 songs in there now so it's not super curated..

do you share your top-24 anywhere?

I would presume it’s entirely subjective and the significance of each song is encoded in the context of life at that particular time.

There were a couple of months this year where my kids wanted to listen to Sesame Street “Letter L” and “The Word is No” while commuting. Hearing those songs on a playlist would remind me whatever was happening, but would have absolutely no significance to you.


Absolutely.. I do this monthly/yearly thing primarily for me. Some of my friends follow along because I listen to a lot of music so I'm sort of a recommendation engine for them, but I never think about that when I am adding stuff to these playlists.

It's purely to recall and revisit what I was personally enjoying at the time.

I don't really connect music to life events though, like if I go back to May 2022 for example I won't listen to those songs and think "oh I remember XYZ about that time"... It will just be re-discovering some music I had perhaps forgotten about, since I listen to a lot of music and can't really remember all of it.


All my monthly playlists and the yearly best-of are public on my profile:

https://open.spotify.com/user/sebastienbarre


I just saw a 57.1% percent match go by.. That sure would have convinced me to buy more tickets.. :-)

That would only be like $7 in powerball ;)

Lottery working as intended! :-)

I guess buying the vinyl is like buying a shirt or a poster now?

I support artists I like by going to their shows and buying lossless digital copies where possible (even if I listen to their music elsewhere).

But I don't want or need more physical "stuff".


> I guess buying the vinyl is like buying a shirt or a poster now?

Yeah, in some way that's true. In the house music scene almost every producer also sells vinyls of their best songs, sometimes "collectors editions", and also DJs obviously sometimes pride themselves on only playing vinyl. For the artists I really do enjoy, I tend to buy their songs + with the vinyl, as a way to support them, but I indeed have no way of actually playing them, and haven't had for more than a decade.

So here I sit with 20+ vinyl records, most of them unopened, and no record player. But I don't mind, I just want to give money to the artists that provide me joy.


Are these smaller artists that also have a Patreon? The first time I moved and had to move and get rid of all my stuff I swore I wouldn’t accumulate it anymore. As much as I like the idea of a vinyl collection I would not want to lug it around during my next move…Stuff is heavy.


I still have my old BluRay collection which I build up from the mid 2000. This already was the replacement of the DVDs I had before. They still sit in the shelve because I don’t know what else to do with the space. Same goes for books etc. I mean I really like the covers etc and the fact one has a physical token. But I simply have too much of it in my house already. And replacing the stuff yet again feels useless. I also like the feeling that if I wanted I could simply let go. Before someone asks: The unit the BluRays are located is a TV unit. And getting rid of them would mean I have an empty shelve. They also cover the cable / power cord mess behind it a bit. So removing is actually not a solution. I would either need a replacement to put there as a cover or get rid of the TV unit shelve thing :). Typical 1st world problem that is.


About 15 years ago I got rid of almost all of my physical media. I was moving a lot at the time (I've moved 13 times over the last 20 years, several times to different cities) and I had hundreds of CDs, DVDs and books.. It was literally a quarter of my boxes every time I moved..

So I sold and donated all of it, kept what had special value, and re-acquired a lot of it digitally.

I still think I made the right decision, although every now and then I miss something specific and regret it, but I get over it pretty fast.


I also moved many times in the past. Once CD-quality settled, I gifted my vinyls to a thrift store. (The 'art' was immaterial.)

20 years ago, I ripped all of my CDs into 192K MP3s (perfect enough for my ears) using an online metadata service. Getting rid of the 'jewel cases' (and eventually all of their non-CD content) but retaining the CDs (4 Logic cases worth, 3 sq. feet) saved a ton of room.

For backup I archived the thousands of MP3s onto an 80GB Seagate which I organized by genre, then stored in a shoebox. 12 years later I copied the Seagate to two more HDs. It worked fine (but gave-up-the-ghost later that year).

I've relied on those files since. Unlike several dead self-burned CD-Rs, the manu'd CDs (I never use) seem to have remained healthy in the cases at room temp.


I did the same as you about 20 years ago. And about three years ago, I started reinvesting in physical ownership again for my music and movies. For me this started from a desire to reduce my reliance on major tech companies, especially licensed content like media. But since moving in that direction, I've found it very rewarding to curate a collection reflective of my evolving taste, and find I treat my time with a spinning record or blu-ray I had to insert with more focus and attention.

I don't share the anecdote to suggest in any way that you or anyone else would feel the same.


Moving that many times is enough to make a person give up interest in all physical possessions, not just media.


You're not wrong.. At one point I could fit all my worldly possessions in a cargo van. It actually felt pretty nice, although I wouldn't want that to be the case at this point in my life.

The only "cheat" was a half-dozen boxes of childhood keepsakes in my parents' basement - that are now in my basement. ;-)


Yeah, I've done this. I've bought records for years but only bought a record player recently. I would want to buy something at the merch table for a small band I like. They don't always have a shirt in my size but they always have records. Oftentimes the records went on loan to friends, which was a nice way of gently spreading my taste.


Albums are art that can be displayed and one of the most accessible forms of real-art-connected-to-the-artist.


On the wall above the table with my turntables hang the album covers of some of the albums that were influential in my musical path as a dj. The records are still in their sleeves in a flight case


Yeah, I also buy digital for this reason.


some do it as speculative collectible too


yeah it's just something for display. I wish vinyl packaging came with a spine.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: