Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | r-johnv's commentslogin

uv is a good example of this.

I absolutely love that Grady includes full transcripts of his videos.

It's much faster to read the article than watch the video, even though that hurts him by 1 view.

I just watched parts of the video after reading because I wanted to see his explanations.

One of the few really good creators out there.


Reading the transcript doesn’t even give you 10% of the information actually conveyed in the video which is why it’s so much faster.

If you already understand the concepts you're not gaining much by watching the video.

If you don't then I'm sure it's better than nothing but idk if stock footage is where you should be developing your mental model of how a tire hydroplanes or how a paved transfers load into what's below it.


Some of it is stock but Grady has a lot of custom animations and miniature scale replicas in his videos all the time.

Writing off Practical Engineering's videos as "stock footage" is utterly hilarious to me.

C'mon. I know everyone on HN just can't help but glaze anyone who deals with "real world things" rather than 1s and 0s but this is absolutely not one of his more original content videos. You can't simulate landing aircraft using a clear plastic box (one of his better props) like you can soil conditions so you get what you get.

If you watched the video you would know he didn’t. Animations only in this one.

Important to note that it does not include a fine.

So the penalty for breaking the law is being forced to follow the law for 5-20 years? (Or am I simplifying it too much and missing something?)


> So the penalty for breaking the law is being forced to follow the law for 5-20 years?

That was how I read it as well…

Either I’m missing something obvious or this doesn’t seem like a punishment at all. I don’t get it.


Thank you for pointing that out.

I'm recalibrating my own behavior to upvote more.

Is it the desired behavior of HN that silent upvotes are for agreement? (Instead of a positive comment that doesn't add substantially to the discourse?)


Which are these? Information online didn't seem very clear on that split?


Uv and uvx have been such game changers when we tried to distribute our python packages.


"New clues as to why the ancient and advances Indus valley civilization vanished" is the original article title.

More informative, less clickbaity.

Other than that, I quite enjoyed the article and the parallels to how modern cities might shift with changes in climate patterns.



Probably a better title would be "Found a way to make people aware of opportunities for kindness"

The hypothesis that they propose is that 'the addition of an unusual character like Batman on the subway made people who otherwise may have been lost in their own thoughts or podcast look around and be more aware of people around them, and this more likely to notice the pregnant woman and offer their seat'

I'm looking forward to the follow up paper to test the hypothesis.


Does it need liquid cooling in order to sustain operation at that power density?

I see ports on its edges that look like fluid connectors.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: