What were the political commitments of the writers of the pre-WWI history you read? Could they have an incentive to characterize things this way?

The summation aligns with everything I've ever read from anyone about Bismarck and Kaiser Wilhelm.

Behind the Bastards has a pretty good couple of episodes on this little corner of history: https://podcasts.apple.com/ke/podcast/part-one-kaiser-wilhel...

Margaret MacMillan is a modern historian with a liberal world view and no ideological incentive to defend Bismarck, and in her phenomenal work The War that Ended Peace (2013) she largely supports this view.

When the debt gets this big and fixed obligations can't be changed devaluation becomes the only workable solution. Yet it's still robbery.

There's a other group besides these: the secret society, who infiltrate the cathedrals, the megachurches and the bazaar. They are quite cultish, but thankfully the "Data Primacy Lodge" is gaining more initiates than the old guard "Order of Objects"

Well put

You have to be careful which codebase to try this on. I have a feeling if someone unleashed agents on the Linux kernel to fix bugs it'd lead to a ban on agents there

On the other hand, finding fixing issues for months is still training data

Yeah if you let them index chromium I'm sure it could do it next week. It just won't be original or interesting.

Are you arguing that we are no worse at building bridges than we were 100 years ago?

OP (breppp) posts nothing but political content. Such accounts should be banned.

In any MENA related post I've just learned to use inverted ranking. Start at the bottom and go up. Might make a chrome extension to toggle that