I think this is a suboptimal solution, putting your life at risk (and potentially harming or killing others with no legitimate justification) to avoid debt repayment. There are better ways to increase quality of life while avoiding the debt imho.
You're applying technical info to a social problem.
Americans don't trust the medical system, MAGA Americans are likely to trust it less statistically due to who the opioid pandemic/over subscription issue hit (watching a potentially close family member go from productive to an addict that started on legally subscribed drugs is hard).
> MAGA Americans are likely to trust it less statistically due to who the opioid pandemic/over subscription issue hit
Quite on brand to go from "personal responsibility" and "you can always avoid bad businesses" to directly blaming someone else when something actually ends up affecting them personally.
Not to mention two giant problems with the entire scientific community:
1. It just sucks at communication. Many people have been misled because marketeers lied to them "it's scientifically proven!" while scientists did nothing to fix that, because they only cared about preserving communication channels between themselves. The mistrust in science is obvious if you take this into account.
2. At the end of the day, scientists are people who have their biases and weaknesses. There have been well-documented cases of the entire scientific community doing a massive fuckup. So when now a bunch of scientists come and say "trust us bro, this time it's legit" it's reasonable to be sceptical.
The last graph of stack overflow seems more like just wanting to paste in a good graph, rather than a useful one for the topic. The downfall of SO is well earned and meaningful as a topic (in a different article).
It's worse than that in reality, AI chips are on a two year cadence for backwards compatibility (NVIDIA can basically guarantee it, and you probably won't be able to pay real AI devs enough to stick around to make hardware work arounds). So their accounting is optimistic.
5 years is normal-ish depreciation time frame. I know they are gaming GPUs, but the RTX 3090 came out ~ 4.5 years before the RTX 5090. The 5090 has double the performance and 1/3 more memory. The 3090 is still a useful card even after 5 years.
Technically probably true since that class of people see rich and wealth as very different. Having better food/electronics/entertainment is being rich. Having assets that pay out or maintain value forever is wealth.
They aren't. House reps and Senators both spend over half their time fundraising, they're gonna behave perfectly normally and ignore whatever they need to for fundraising purposes.
reply