> Without them making a statement of how long they will provide security updates
They said this:
What version of Android will be supported?
Communicator will run Android 16. We’re comfortable committing to 2 years of Android updates and 5 years of security updates.
Perl's "decline" means there is some metric to measure how high Perl is. It was higher, but now it is lower. I don't think the metric is well-defined, though.
I hope this doesn't come off as argumentative. You said that with Python "In two days I had what I wanted", but another way of looking at it: in a week of not succeeding in Perl plus those two days in Python, you had what you wanted.
- weird sigil rules where the 0 element of @x is $x[0] not @x[0]
'@' and '%' indicate containers, while '$' is a scalar (which containers can contain). So '$x[0]' is referring to a scalar within the '@x' container. If you operate on a container, like 'push @x, 2', it uses the container sigil.
I guess "weird" triggered me a bit, heh. I know it's subjective.
Not sure if it counts as "really works", but on Windows with PowerToys you can enable Keyboard Manager and 'Remap a key'. (Might want to remap right-Ctrl to CapsLock, in case it turns CapsLock on.)
There's also old Registry hacks to do the same thing.
I haven't incorporated Anki yet, but I guess a similar idea would be Memrise. My experience with that for Korean was that it was too intense in the beginning, since it was throwing random (though basic) phrases of like 9 syllables at me, and I couldn't keep them straight. I am considering trying Memrise again, since I've gone through A2 level on Busuu since then, and know more basic phrases and grammar. I do think I should be building my own Anki set by this point, but I've been too lazy.
Helping with language learning is one of the things I think ChatGPT is excellent for. I have a long-term conversation only about Korean, and I can ask questions like "how would a Korean understand [some grammatical structure]?" and it gives very insightful answers, and even refers back to vocabulary that I've already used or other discussions about similar topics.
"However, De Vos (2005:59) points out that try and may not be preceded by both: "
[example] "John will both try and kill mosquitos."
Then the next sentence has "try and is available only when both try and the verb following and are uninflected". (only when "both try and")
I know the italicization of "try" and "and" makes it a different thing grammatically, just thought it was amusing.
They said this:
reply