Shameless plug: If you need really-fast route matching, consider https://github.com/kumarshantanu/calfpath (performance benchmarks are included)

Could you please also post the slides in PDF? The current download is probably for Keynote, which works only for Mac/Keynote users.

Also the .key file only seems to include the first 7 slides, so it's a bit hard to follow the talk. Very interesting presentation though, thanks!

Did you consider only the local, or also the global 'remote' talent pool?

both.

Very limited

This page discusses the issue in question: http://j.mp/repeatability

Jump to section 'Free-Floating Jars' if you're feeling impatient. :)

This petition seems more appropriate: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/remove-united-stat...

Probably this would help :) http://viewtext.org/article?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwinningracecond...

Agree with antihero. The music is not great.

Any suggestions for better music?

Look on pro.jamendo.com

It appears more functional in style: http://laravel.com/docs/routing#the-basics

Good to see that.

This story is from 1991. Mentioning this in the title would be helpful.

A year ago there would have been no question this was a joke. Now, I'm not so sure.

it's fairly common to ask for the year to be included in submission titles that are old. It helps clarify for the reader that we're going to see something out of computer history (or general world history) rather than something brand new.

Well, my first thought was: "what hubris is this?", before taking note of the archaic name and the domain name and figuring it was probably an interesting old Usenet post. Adding [1991] would perhaps prevent someone from missing it through a similar line of thought?

Yeah, I saw the name and [google.com] (missing the [groups.] part) and the first comment quoting the revolution... I was bracing myself.

They should consider moving the discussion to Google Groups or something. Not everybody loves to read the discussion threads via email.

I've always found mailman's web interface a lot easier to read than Google Groups. e.g.: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2012-January/thr...

AFAIK Google Groups don't even support threads

I grew up with computers in the 80s that didn't have Internet connectivity. I didn't get Internet access at home until 2005. Mailing lists confuse the hell out of me.

That's interesting, considering that mailing lists (like news/Usenet) were ideal for offline use, having been designed back in the day when Internet often had to be dialed up at specific times to exchange mail and news asynchronously (remember UUCP?). You can read and write submissions offline and submit them later.