Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jephson's commentslogin

I recall being 6 years old and singing the "Wonder Woman lost her bosoms" variant at primary school in New Zealand. This was 1982 so definitely sung internationally prior to The Simpsons.


> Interesting that he died of a heart attack at a relatively young, healthy man(61).

He had an earlier heart attack at age 25, long before COVID-19.


I hadn't heard that before. Where did you get that information?


“SA: Yes, I had a heart attack when I was twenty-five. I had a viral infection of the pericardium.”

https://www.furious.com/perfect/shellac.html


I expected the article to be about The Trons https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trons


Can you make the same case using a country sharing a similar lack of public sector corruption with New Zealand? New Zealand consistently ranks as one of the least corrupt countries, Brazil not so much: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index



This reminds me of a recent documentary about a billionaire transporting trees, often purchased from families in financial distress, to his private fantasy garden: Taming The Garden https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taming_the_Garden


> Chicken have been seen as food for the majority of our existence on this planet

This may not be correct: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jun/06/chickens-wer...


Seeing that colorful jungle fowl reminds me of a conversation I had with my friend about pigeons and doves.

We consider doves to be an "elegant" bird, all white, used in religious imagery and magicians' tricks, and so on, while we consider pigeons to be a "dirty" bird, mostly known for scavenging food in cities, even though they're basically the same type of bird. People chase them around for fun.

But if someone had only ever seen white doves and suddenly saw a much more colorful version of the bird that we call pigeons, they'd probably consider it to be the more fanciful, impressive-looking bird.


> really improbable that anyone else would try to replicate the endeavor.

Not so, this week I bought one of the cameras mentioned in the article for the same purpose.


I am glad for you that you can afford this, but I still think it is really too expensive/complicated for the benefits you are supposed to get from it.


Legowelt and Ceephax Acid Crew have come to dominate my listening over the past decade. Favourite Legowelt release ever (in the guise of The Psychic Stewardess) is Spiritual Foundation: https://shop.hott.mx/album/strange-life-records-slr037-spiri.... I'll never forget how much I was already loving the album on first listen, then Shinobi Theme started playing: my absolute favorite game in the late 80s.


> from blobs-of-HTML-in-a-database

Gutenberg has doubled down on blobs of HTML in the database: everything within `<body>` is stored as one big blob if using "full site editing", including additional markup defined using HTML comments. There is far less separation between data and how it's presented than there ever was with the "classic" editor.


> There is far less separation between data and how it's presented than there ever was with the "classic" editor.

This is not correct, surely?

Yes, if you're using FSE you're getting a template from that which is more or less a page. FSE replaces the header/footer/sidebar/widget area thing with an editable scheme.

That is, on one level, a big chunk of HTML -- but it is stored as a block graph (see below). And as far as I am aware the work has been done to allow it to produce HTML5 semantic tags?

There is an insertion point in the FSE template for content from hooks or the loop, which may or may not be returning block graphs. Post content can also now contain loops as created by query blocks, etc.

And yeah, Gutenberg stores as HTML internally.

But the distinction I am drawing here still holds.

The classic model was a blob of post content that was minimally post-processed to expand shortcodes. It didn't attempt to understand the HTML except in a minimal way to figure out if a shortcode should end up in a wrapper tag.

The rest of it was sent straight out into the page (after autop). TinyMCE then tried to deal with it, and had to recognise shortcode patterns. That is what I mean by a "blob": most HTML was handled in an unthinking, unprocessed manner. As text.

In the Gutenberg era they still do store HTML in post_content (for good reason) but it is in a form that can be serialised and deserialised into blocks -- it is not simply markup; it's a complete serialisation format.

https://make.wordpress.org/core/2017/01/17/editor-technical-...

https://developer.wordpress.org/block-editor/explanations/ar...

And unlike in the Classic Editor era where the HTML is handed to TinyMCE for it to sort out, and then sent back and stored as whatever it submitted (minimally filtered), WP can now serialise and deserialise that information as a block graph in both PHP and JS, and there are hooks at both sides.

Yes -- the stored content can be rendered in its frozen form (and will be, by any theme that doesn't know about blocks).

But it can be processed as a block graph instead.

So in fact the data is being stored in a much more semantically accessible way; not only dumb HTML processed with what amounts to regexps.

The fact that it's _also_ effectively HTML in post_content rather than, say, JSON in a new column is a design decision to maximise compatibility.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: