How'd you source the information? Curious to see Cloudera listed as dead and wasn't able to find anything corroborating this online.

The author posted this on a vibe coding subreddit, so I'd be willing to wager some AI deep research with manual clean up.

Seems like it. That would explain the various suspicious entries and lack of rigor (missing thousands of smaller startups that have failed in the last decade)

Genuity was also bought out. Domo seems alive and well.

Circling the drain, but not dead

Your conclusion is a non sequitur. Of course Customs revenue boomed, that’s what tariffs do. To assess impact on the country’s reliance on foreign goods you’d need to see how the volume of foreign imports changed over time.

This has been my one wish from Amazon as a consumer for years. I wonder what’s finally driving the decision? In the end the increased trust will be good for business, but one has to imagine there’ll be teething pains from the policy change.

You know, if everybody shouts at you to not do a certain thing, maybe, just maybe, they could have your best interests in mind? But instead they are being portrayed as "globalists" or whatever the mouthbreathers in the flyover states spin up today.

I really hope the US heals, quickly.

That's of course a totally valid reason to destroy your institutions, international reputation, and of course the lives of many poor people in your country. Makes sense /s

The website answers this question directly:

> This website is a product of the Department of Archaeology, Monuments and Archaeology (MenA), City of Amsterdam, in cooperation with the Chief Technology Office (CTO), City of Amsterdam.

Seems to me like a good, culturally enriching way for a city to spend a bit of time and money.

Yeah, but can you use your enjoyment of video games as marketing material to justify a $32B valuation?

If you look at submissions from this website, its all just self glazing and "We did X with claude code"

Haha exactly. This screams “we have too many people working here and don’t know what to do with them”.

actually it was all to drive traffic to my 'rollercoaster coasters' Etsy store

https://bansostudio.etsy.com

^ this guy funds

Not so sure. He said justify.

> oblivious to the shore in front of them rapidly being gobbled up by the sea

Am I misunderstanding this metaphor? Tsunamis pull the sea back before making landfall.

Modern reasoning models are actually pretty good at arithmetic and almost certainly would have caught this error if asked.

Source: we benchmark this sort of stuff at my company and for the past year or so frontier models with a modest reasoning budget typically succeed at arithmetic problems (except for multiplication/division problems with many decimal places, which this isn't).

Interesting, how have you found they have been performing at more complex things like calculus and analysis?

It’s on the front page of HN once in a while.

Web browsers are insanely hard to get right, that’s why there are only ~3 decent implementations out there currently.

The one nice thing about web browsers is that they have a reasonably formalized specification set and a huge array of tests that can be used. So this makes them a fairly unique proposition ideally suited to AI construction.

As far as I read on Ladybird's blog updates, the issue is less the formalised specs, and more that other browsers break the specs, so websites adjust, so you need to take the non-compliance to specs into account with your design