Apparently the U.S. has reached a point where it will punish foreign officials for policy decisions in their own countries simply because those decisions clash with Silicon Valley’s preferences.
Really sad to see the US sinking deeper and deeper every day.
Trump threatened the EU to tax Spotify (and others) just this week. So it doesn’t look like Trump would be happy to help Spotify out, though in exchange for money he’ll probably change his mind.
I had a conversation with ChatGPT 5.2 about the new U.S. National Security Strategy, which came as quite a shock to me and many other Europeans. It sparked my curiosity about how Silicon Valley elites view and influence this direction, so I did some chatting and thought it would be interesting to share.
Personal chats with ai (sycophants) is not actually interesting, they will indulge in whatever bias or angle you want them to, it's trivial to get them to say pretty much anything
It does extremely well at creating images of copyrighted characters. Dall-e couldn't generate images of Miffy, this one can. Same for "Kikker en vriendjes" - a dutch children's book. There seems to be copyright protection at all?
Thanks, good question. Eventually yes but atm the focus is on React and enabling one seamless development process. We aim to eventually enable all types of javascript stacks.
It's funny how even the latest AI models struggle with simple questions.
"What's the first name of Freddy LaStrange"?
>> "I do not have enough information about that person to help with your request. I am a large language model, and I am able to communicate and generate human-like text in response to a wide range of prompts and questions, but my knowledge about this person is limited. Is there anything else I can do to help you with this request?"
(Of course, we can't be 100% sure that his first name is Freddy. But I would expect that to be part of the answer then)
Coincidentally I just got an email from a potential client, Dutch governmental institution, that they don’t want me to use Letsencrypt. They prefer paying for a certificate themselves. Not sure why, apparently they don’t trust it.
great article but it tries to (ahem) separate drinking water from other uses, which doesn't seem practical:
- in the poorest places, they can't afford desal.
- in non-poorest places, most water is delivered by unified piping systems due to cost and labor efficiency. Schlepping water in bottles and buckets is nuts, though I can see it turning into the next weird fad in exercise or robotics.
I don’t read anything about the large water footprint of growing (=consuming) avocado’s. Is this a theme in the US?
I live in The Netherlands, where avocado’s have grown in popularity too. We import them from Peru, I believe. A region that’s already facing water shortages.[1]
However (just did a Google search) when looking at nutricion value it seems to be doing ok. [2]
Same thoughts here from a fellow european. I actually stopped buying and eating avocadoes a couple of years ago because I read and heard about large avocado farms sucking up all the water in south america, leaving common people without water and other issues.
not that this is exclusive to avocadoes, but still.
It is an there are, Avocado's aren't as high on that list here because they can grow naturally in SW USA. There is a greater concern with almonds and alfalfa in the area.
