There is an ethical side of generative ai that looks a lot like bulk plagiarism. Some folks push back when it seems like you charge a bunch of money for a game but didn't put in a bunch of effort and even stole some of it.

This is how things get built for me as well. I have a standing desk and like using it occasionally but if you see me standing at it you can bet I'm doing something typical like emails or chat and not thinking deeply.

Remember you don't have to feed the trolls.

It's frustrating when people fake argue with you on the internet and seem like they just aren't quite engaging with what you're saying. Unfortunately, sometimes that's the point since it inherently devalues the conversation as a whole.

Not telling you what to do; just passing by and reminding that you're under no obligation to engage with a convo that isn't good faith because sometimes I forget that myself in the moment.

I believe, i cannot reason pathological dipshits out of ther idiocy. I do this for the silent, maybe tumbling bystanders. But thanks for the heads up.

This article renders really poorly on iPhone Safari - the left side of the text is cut off a little bit (the example the first header reads as "keaways" instead of takeaways).

It's not possible to read it in Firefox Mobile either unless you do it on landscape mode.

Says the author of the upcoming book "Motivated Noise: All modern internet discourse is just self promotion"

Last time I went to Denver I didn't get chased and everyone I met seemed pretty great.

Here's where we get paid if we make you go today.

Are the constantly crowing, entitled ingrates with their condescending lectures in the room right now?

Yeah, they're the ones trying to gaslight Americans into believing that NATO hasn't been a completely lopsided relationship since the end of the Cold War, and that it makes complete sense that Americans be treaty-bound to defend nations like Sweden (which lifted not one finger when Finland was invaded by the Soviet Union and its territory annexed, and also later when Norway was invaded and occupied by Nazi Germany), a country where less than half of the population had a favorable view of us as a nation, before Trump.

Obviously I don't agree with his threats over Greenland, but acting like the end of NATO would be a huge loss for the US is ridiculous. Look at how obsequious European heads of government are towards Trump, even in the face of these threats; that tells you all you need to know about whom NATO truly benefits. They know if the US withdraws from Europe completely, they'll have to up their military spending considerably to plug the gaps, which will strain the welfare state.

>Yeah, they're the ones trying to gaslight Americans into believing that NATO hasn't been a completely lopsided relationship since the end of the Cold War, and that it makes complete sense that Americans be treaty-bound to defend nations like Sweden

Sweden just joined NATO in 2024, so what does the cold war have to do with it?

> a country where less than half of the population had a favorable view of us as a nation, before Trump.

Ok? Yes, it was looking like Sweden thought Russia was the bigger threat, so they joined NATO in 2024, but I guess Trump is making them regret this.

I think it was a polite way of saying "I think that is an exaggeration" and instead focusing on the part they agreed on.

One value is in searching for additional vulnerabilities.