Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | behnamoh's commentslogin

It took 30 years for linux to finally fulfill "x is the year of Linux Desktop", but I don't know if *BSD will ever get there.

It is more that Windows abdicated its 87% market share due to incompetence in brand management. =3

fine by me, microsoft deserves to go to hell.

I don't care about your "constitution" because it's just a PR way of implying your models are going to take over the world. They are not. They're tools and you as the company that makes them should stop the AGI rage bait and fearmongering. This "safety" narrative is bs, pardon my french.

>We treat the constitution as the final authority on how we want Claude to be and to behave—that is, any other training or instruction given to Claude should be consistent with both its letter and its underlying spirit. This makes publishing the constitution particularly important from a transparency perspective: it lets people understand which of Claude’s behaviors are intended versus unintended, to make informed choices, and to provide useful feedback. We think transparency of this kind will become ever more important as AIs start to exert more influence in society.

IDK, sounds pretty reasonable.



It's more or less formalizing the system prompt as something that can't just be tweaked willy nilly. I'd assume everyone else is doing something similar.

what if you want to show ````? should you add ````` tags then?

Yes; TFA contains enough explanation to make it clear how to extend this arbitrarily.

See also https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/82718 .


A lot of it, and their Claude Cowork is all claude's work (according to claude code's creator).

after trying out Claude Cowork, I can definitely believe it was vibe coded

> The good news: we shipped our differential renderer to everyone today. We rewrote our rendering system from scratch[1] and only ~1/3 of sessions see at least a flicker. Very, very few sessions see flickers in rapid succession which was so annoying before. Those numbers will keep dropping as people update.

I'm using the latest version and see terrible flicker in tmux still. You guys should be ashamed tbh.


How tall is your tmux pane? If it's very small it might still flicker as CC tries to redraw scrollback. I've noticed several tmux users have layouts where they stack several panes on top of each other making each one quite short.

Another option is to rebuild tmux from latest source so it buffers synchronized output, which should prevent the flicker entirely.

If you're still seeing a terrible flicker please file a `/bug`!


Thanks for your response.

> How tall is your tmux pane? If it's very small it might still flicker as CC tries to redraw scrollback. I've noticed several tmux users have layouts where they stack several panes on top of each other making each one quite short.

It's full screen ("maximized" as tmux calls it).

> Another option is to rebuild tmux from latest source so it buffers synchronized output, which should prevent the flicker entirely.

I'll give it a shot.


I'm sorry for the low quality comment, but man, get some perspective.

> low quality comment

What else do you want me to say? It's ironic that one has to jump through hoops (like this post) to get basic functionality right in a tool that claims it'll replace software engineers.


Perspective is: how hard can it possibly be? It’s a TUI. This should be able to run on a calculator.

Am I missing some complexity here?


Thanks dang, but they didn't address the issue entirely and the scrolling issue still persists too.

Not implying the issue is closed...I just (<-- secret agenda) thought it was fun that the creator of Claude Code posted it :)

Haha, yeah it was CC's creator!

it has, but python being single threaded (until recently) didn't make it an attractive choice for CLI tools.

example: `ranger` is written in python and it's freaking slow. in comparison, `yazi` (Rust) has been a breeze.

Edit: Sorry, I meant GIL, not single thread.


> it has, but python being single threaded (until recently) didn't make it an attractive choice for CLI tools.

You probably mean GIL, as python has supported multi threading for like 20 years.

Idk if ranger is slow because it is written in python. Probably it is the specific implementation.


> You probably mean GIL

They also probably mean TUIs, as CLIs don't do the whole "Draw every X" thing (and usually aren't interactive), that's basically what sets them apart from CLIs.


Even my CC status line script enjoyed a 20x speed improvement when I rewrote it from python to rust.

It’s surprising how quickly the bottleneck starts to become python itself in any nontrivial application, unless you’re very careful to write a thin layer that mostly shells out to C modules.

> this got written by Claude Code

nit but CC itself doesn't write anything, much like a body w/o brain doesn't program anything. it's possible the OP was using other models like codex/gemini/etc. in CC.


Oh my god who cares?

It's possible it's from some other model or even a human, but it reads like every other Claude Code readme I've seen.

so then it could be written by a claude model inside opencode before anthropic got angry about it :)

OpenCode still works fine with Claude models.

You just can’t use their private APIs, which isn’t really surprising.


There are workarounds on github already... It's less "can't" and more "they don't like it"

then maybe they should've bought and fixed Ink instead of bun, just saying!

FWIW, Ink is working on an incremental rendering system: they have a flag to enable it. It's currently pretty buggy though unfortunately. Definitely wish Anthropic would commit some resources back to the project they're built on to help fix it...

if it works then who cares?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: