Now i find the opposite situation happening and more difficult/ expensive to solve, that is leaving the keys outside the car and driving away without them.
I doubt you have driven a car with these types of keys if you claim this happens.
If you have, I’d ask you to name it explicitly because I have yet to drive one (out of 10+ be driven) that does not visually and audibly scream at you that the key is not in the vehicle. That’s if it will even let you shift out of park (in a non-manual).
> Been waiting for a good replacement for tmux to come along for a while now that isn't just i3
> Does anyone else have a love hate relationship with tmux?
> I hate its scrolling and buffer behavior, its almost impossible to get right.
I wasn't planning on sharing my project on HN until I've written up more documentation, but I'm actually working on exactly this problem.
So far I've got i3-like controls, resizing & scrolling terminal splits with the mouse, and better color support than tmux.
My current roadblock has been lack of motivation, but if *anyone& on HN finds this interesting (or even just files a bug report), I'd be motivated to reignite my work on the project.
Funny, me too! I was adding some features yesterday, a few more today, but I took a few minutes to do screenshots and join the discussion.
If you are focused on better controls, our work may be complementary. Would you like to join forces on a high quality fork? A few things concern me with tmux currently.
https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/1613 is a better reflection of my views on SIXEL, although I am coming round to the idea rather. It is not easy to do properly however, I am interested to see how your code works.
I don't have zsh setup on the OS I'm running currently, but a simple example is that the light-grey autocomplete text from zsh/oh-my-zsh shows up on i3-tmux but not tmux (at least at the time of writing).
I honestly don't remember the exact details, and maybe it's now fixed.
I think you could, and should anyways, make the data anonymous. Just give every participant a GUID for a participant ID and add a step to purge personally identifiable information. Then you can share records without identity.
Anonymizing data is, yes, a difficult problem, but in particular aggregated data can, and has been, reliably anonymized. For example, the problem with this dataset would have been visible in aggregated data (e.g. aggregated by nationality).
I've been using it for the past few weeks due to a problem with the Discord electron client spinning up my fans. Using Discord in the terminal fixes the problem (and scores major geek points!)
The main developer of Cordless is super nice. Each issue I've filed has been an absolute pleasure to discuss.
> Boiling all water on the planet (including all starfish) amounts to about 2^24 lakes of Geneva and leads to global security: 114-bit symmetric cryptosystems, 228-bit cryptographic hashes, 2380-bit RSA. This needs to be done 16 thousand times to break AES-128, SHA-256, or 3064-bit RSA.
I think this paper isn't using Landauer's bounds though, but conventional computers. So maybe my claim was wrong, because we aren't 16 thousand times away from Landauer's bounds but millions [1].
